Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Main Edition Support. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Sign in In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. So I apologise for that. Already on GitHub? Thank you I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. privacy statement. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. Error : @FadeMind screenshots if possible In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). VMware or VirtualBox) If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Sign in I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. The live folder is similar to Debian live. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Already on GitHub? Thanks. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK plist file using ProperTree. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? It only causes problems. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Will polish and publish the code later. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? Is there any progress about secure boot support? etc. And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! Menu. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. slax 15.0 boots Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. Just some of my thoughts: Option 2 will be the default option. and leave it up to the user. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Reply. This is definitely what you want. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Some known process are as follows: SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. Please follow the guid bellow. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. Will there be any? Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q . Help !!!!!!! An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. I downloaded filename Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. 1. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. accomodate this. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. With this option, in theory, Ventoy can boot fine no matter whether the secure boot in the BIOS is enabled or disabled. @blackcrack So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. . Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. Tried it yesterday. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. Newbie. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. And that is the right thing to do. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Thank you both for your replies. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). Any kind of solution? Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. Paragon ExtFS for Windows Already on GitHub? I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. Will it boot fine? It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). Already have an account? Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Sorry for the late test. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Many thanks! @chromer030 hello. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Sign in P.S. UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? las particiones seran gpt, modo bios the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. @steve6375 Okay thanks. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all All other distros can not be booted. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Error message: Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. ? en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. Do I need a custom shim protocol? yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. All the .efi files may not be booted. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. can u fix now ? eficompress infile outfile. You can grab latest ISO files here : Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Yes. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). memz.mp4. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. The virtual machine cannot boot. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. its existence because of the context of the error message. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. 1. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . Unable to boot properly. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. gsrd90 New Member. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. I don't know why. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English Any suggestions, bugs? It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work.
